ART006: Week 1 Readings

12 10 2008

Freeland, “Introduction”

  • “A theory is more than a definition; it is a framework that supplies an orderly explanation of observed phenomena.”
  • Modern art challenges as to why something is art
  • Theories guide our value judgments
  • art manifests itself differently for each culture
  • current art is shocking
  • aesthetics seek to explain why art is valued and what meaning it may have

Freeland, “Blood and Beauty”

  • blood has similarities to paint
  • blood is the human essence
  • blood can be holy or noble
  • blood can indicate passage to adulthood
  • blood can be contaminated
  • art as ritual
  • blood rituals common to various cultures
  • although blood used in rituals are part of the cultural fabric whereas there is not common tradition to draw fro when exposed to art using blood
  • Ron Athey who is HIV+, hung blood-soaked rags above an audience causing a panic
  • Sometimes difficult to tell if use of blood is shocking as art or commerce
  • John Dewey feels artists must exaggerated their separateness to compete in the marketplace
  • Shocking use of bodily fluids often used to comment on religion
  • “Artwork that uses blood or urine enters into the public sphere without the context of either well-understood ritual significance or artistic redemption through beauty.”
  • Aesthetics derives from Greek word for sensation or perception
  • David Hume and Immanuel Kant struggled with defining aesthetic value and why some art was better than others
  • Hume posited that “taste” was learned and acculturated
  • Kant felt that aesthetic taste was a function of the artwork
  • Kant’s way of recognizing beauty has “purposiveness without a purpose”
  • Beauty may be a function of how “right” something is
  • Kant felt that enjoyment of beauty was distinct from other sorts of pleasure
  • Kant believed God did not play a part in beauty but human genius
  • “’Significant for’ is a particular combinations of lines and colours that stir our aesthetic emotions”
  • Bell insisted art should have nothing to do with life or politics
  • Bullough felt sex and politics tend to block aesthetic consciousness
  • Lippard’s defense of Serrano: 1) formal and material properties, 2) content and 3) context
  • Catholic churches hold vials of talismanic items
  • Goya witness to several European wars
  • “Goya’s art made people confront the dire possibilities of human nature in moments of extreme crisis.”
  • Goya’s Horrors of War series made commentary on the legacy of the Enlightenment in contrast to atrocities carried out
  • Artwork in recent years has incorporated a lot of horror

Art in Theory, general introduction

  • The literature of modern art is massive and difficult to access
  • 2 difficult and interconnected question: 1) how is modern art to be defined and 2) how is the field of its relevant interests to be circumscribed?
  • Questions about historical narratives
  • Problems of definition and historical organization
  • Modern art begins with the end of the 19th century
  • “the practice of art constitutes a form of participation or intervention in the social process”
  • Modern art cannot be equated with Modernism
  • Theory is determined post hoc to practice of modern art
  • Representations are determined by social group
  • “the reading of art theory needs to be accompanied by a calling to mind of art itself”
  • Lack of context is one of the major barriers to the study of Modern art
  • Can art theory be distinguished from political, social or philosophic theory?
  • The awareness of history animates the understanding of art
  • Modern art should not be viewed out of context

Williams, “The Analysis of culture”

  • 3 general categories in the definition of culture: 1) the “ideal”, 2) the “documentary” and 3) the “social”
  • The variations of meaning and reference are a “genuine complexity”
  • Considering art theory must be done as a whole
  • There is no element that can be abstracted from the rest
  • Art must be analyzed from the cultural perspective but not assumed to be determined by it
  • We must look at artworks and theory in context to know its social value
  • The history of a culture must take into account the relations to society and context
  • Cultural history must be more than the sum of particular histories
  • “the theory of culture as a the study of relationships between elements in a whole way of life.”
  • In studying historical context, the flavor of the times will always be lost
  • 3 levels of culture: 1) lived culture for those in those times, 2) recorded culture and 3) the culture of selective tradition
  • “cultural tradition can be seen as a continual selection and re-selection of ancestors”
  • “We tend to underestimate the extent to which the cultural tradition is not only a selection but also an interpretation.”

Stiles, general introduction

  • Clement Greenberg coined the term “modernism”
  • Greenberg argued advanced art moved from greater to lesser complexity
  • Greenberg required each artistic medium to become self-referential
  • “The modernist paradigm is generally understood to reflect rational liberal humanism and a belief in progress established during the Enlightenment.”
  • “The advent of postmodernist contingency placed modernist objectivity in doubt”
  • The modernist belief in truth replaced by radical relativism
  • Visual art encompasses many more forms
  • Artists began to use new modes of expressing their theories on art but widely neglected
  • 3 foundational concepts shaping art historiography: 1) the centrality of individual artistic authority, 2) its links to the creation of unique objects and 3) the hierarchal position of painting and sculpture in cultural production.
  • Past art historians were rarely questioned but modern art historians may be continually questioned
  • “theory industry” emerged in the 1980’s
  • The culture industry connected to the “consciousness industry”
  • Art theory forced to take on any roles
  • “the best artist is a dead artist” because they cannot argue with the historian and critics retain the authorial voice
  • Artists reject analysis of their works
  • Text and object as the object of theoretical discourse
  • “when theory by artists becomes art, emotion is read to triumph over reason and knowledge.”
  • “Artists’ theories and statements are a part of the material evidence and conceptual apparatus of their work and must be understood as an integral component of art historical and critical theory.”

Dissanayake, “What is art for?”

  • Humans have always engaged in art
  • Our view of art controverts its biological and evolutionary significance
  • Making “art” is not what matters but “making special”
  • Art is a normal and natural evolution as language
  • Art should be viewed from the larger, global, historic view of man
  • Western art produced as a commodity is anomalous in the global scope
  • Art viewed biologically as a universal behavior that characterizes our species which contributes to its survival
  • People in modern times don’t have time to consider their experience
  • No value judgments in making art special, neither good or bad
  • We let artists make things special and then purchase them
  • “decorating or adorning were ways of showing that one participated in a social order and was a moral member of society”
  • Art used as a means of escape and disconnected from its social role, as an individual pursuit
  • “Hillman also says that we have become so individualized and conditioned to experience ourselves as separate, we know have an actual fear of community”
  • “we’re no living in the environment for which we were adapted as a species”
  • “we are really hunter-gatherers thrust into a kind of supermechanisitic, anonymous, hypermediated environment that we’re not preadapted to live in.”
  • There is a limit to adaptation
  • “we’ve somehow created a world to which we cannot adapt, in which we cannot humanly live”

Actions

Information

Leave a comment